Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Revisiting GLEP 81 (acct-*) policies (reviews, cross-distro syncing)
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:54:34
Message-Id: e204fada-1a00-44bf-48f3-29cad3cb6dc2@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Revisiting GLEP 81 (acct-*) policies (reviews, cross-distro syncing) by "Michał Górny"
1 Hi,
2
3 I fully agree with #3. But I would go one step further:
4
5 Make complete SYS_UID_MIN - SYS_UID_MAX range available for GLEP 81.
6
7 The only argument/reason I am aware of, "but 501-999 could be used by
8 system" (Dynamic allocation by user.eclass), isn't strong enough from my
9 POV because system administrator can already pick something between
10 SYS_UID_MIN-MAX so system must be already capable of dealing with such
11 scenarios. So why do you think this range must be reserved? Isn't
12 blocking 501-999 just another random choice?
13
14 Therefor I would change the recommendation to pick highest free number.
15 I.e. it should be recommended to pick the lowest free UID/GID pair
16 instead (just to avoid fragmentation and keep 501+ free as long as
17 possible).
18
19
20 --
21 Regards,
22 Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
23 C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies