1 |
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> El lun, 01-07-2013 a las 21:55 +0200, Fabio Erculiani escribió: |
3 |
>> I believe that end users would benefit more from kernel binary ebuilds |
4 |
>> (ebuilds building an actual kernel with an official config), rather |
5 |
>> than all this. |
6 |
>> |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I don't see them exclusionary, look different issues to me :/ (with |
9 |
> completely different solutions I think) |
10 |
|
11 |
Of course I'm not saying that they're not orthogonal. OTOH I believe |
12 |
that the complexity of supporting something like this (the original |
13 |
proposal) is not linear. However, I don't see any problem with people |
14 |
implementing it btw... it's their time. |
15 |
|
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Fabio Erculiani |