Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
Cc: brad@g.o, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:11:28
Message-Id: 1063645727.2992.84.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP by Luke-Jr
1 I like the idea of having a basic ISO as we do now, then having the GRP
2 packages on the mirrors in their respective release directory. The
3 -current idea sounds pretty good to me, also. We would of course want
4 to keep the portage snapshots in the release directories so they stay in
5 sync.
6
7 On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 12:52, Luke-Jr wrote:
8 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
9 > Hash: SHA1
10 >
11 > Since we are (probably) moving to having the GRPs themselves on the mirrors
12 > (and not ISOs), this is probably better accomplished by simply making new
13 > GRPs for every (major) release of commonly GRP'd packages and keeping them in
14 > a "current" directory.
15 >
16 > On Monday 15 September 2003 03:59 pm, Brad Laue wrote:
17 > > Greetings all,
18 > >
19 > > A concern of mine about many Linux distributions is that in the long
20 > > haul between binary releases of a distribution, the packages included
21 > > with the release can become quite old. In Gentoo's case, if one GRP
22 > > installed their system nine months from now and emerge -u'd, they would
23 > > be faced with a considerable number of packages to update (I wouldn't be
24 > > surprised if it was all of them).
25 > >
26 > > The Gentoo 1.4.1 release re-ignited my curiosity on this topic. Will
27 > > there be regular interim releases between major upgrades, or will
28 > > releases like these solely fix bugs?
29 > >
30 > > If the latter, can a GRP ISO be created say, every two months? This
31 > > would only add ‾500MB per architecture involved, since there wouldn't be
32 > > any need to archive the older versions of the ISO.
33 > >
34 > > Realising that Gentoo is of course a source-based distribution, quickly
35 > > and easily installing the latest and greatest by using emerge -k, then
36 > > optimizing by rebuilding incrementally has surely sparked a great deal
37 > > of additional interest in the distribution.
38 > >
39 > > What does everyone think?
40 > >
41 > > Brad
42 > >
43 > >
44 > > --
45 > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
46 >
47 > - --
48 > Luke-Jr
49 > Developer, Gentoo Linux
50 > http://www.gentoo.org/
51 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
52 > Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
53 >
54 > iD8DBQE/Ze5gZl/BHdU+lYMRAvLOAJ0YODT4ROaBn4Uy1EOMuQpaSTuX1wCeNzlG
55 > Ux7ScHmXS8BRPC8jvACyRYE=
56 > =iBEM
57 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
58 >
59 >
60 > --
61 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
62 --
63 Chris Gianelloni
64 Developer, Gentoo Linux
65 Games Team
66
67 Is your power animal a pengiun?

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4.1 and GRP Brad Laue <brad@g.o>