From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree | ||
Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2013 16:08:58 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130814170848.2e06a07b@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets in the tree by Patrick Lauer |
1 | On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:59:28 +0800 |
2 | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > > Uhm. Look at the class line. |
4 | > > |
5 | > > https://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/kde.git;a=blob;f=sets.conf;h=1f4c4263f48e5360606c1acc97fbab64b03541b7;hb=HEAD |
6 | > |
7 | > ... a static identifier. |
8 | > |
9 | > I would usually call that a constant. Now I get bored with your |
10 | > trolling. Goodbye. |
11 | |
12 | Please explain, for the benefit of everyone who posts to this list, why |
13 | my claim that the line "class = portage.sets.files.StaticFileSet" in |
14 | sets.conf corresponds to a class in Portage is "trolling". |
15 | |
16 | Your claim that this is a "constant" is contradicted not just by common |
17 | sense and the Portage code, but also by the Portage documentation: |
18 | |
19 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/portage.html#config-set |
20 | |
21 | > The configuration of a single set can be very simple as in most cases |
22 | > it only requires a single option class to be complete [1]. That option |
23 | > defines which handler class should be used to create the set. |
24 | |
25 | -- |
26 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |