| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 08:05:50PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Samstag, 30. September 2017, 19:03:59 CEST schrieb Keri Harris: |
| 3 |
> > Hi, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Is there a recommended method for testing if a package respects LDFLAGS? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Arch testers are encouraged to add -Wl,--hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS |
| 8 |
> > [1],[2] and portage uses scanelf to check for .hash sections. However it |
| 9 |
> > appears that ld defaults to using a .gnu.hash section: |
| 10 |
> That test used to work, but it's broken now. We need a new one. |
| 11 |
How about something similar to Fedora's binary annotations work, or |
| 12 |
injecting a .note.gentoo section into binaries (containing literal |
| 13 |
C/CXX/LDFLAGS would be useful). |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 17 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Asst. Treasurer |
| 18 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 19 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
| 20 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |
Archives