1 |
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:36:26 +0100 |
2 |
"Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <chainsaw@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> This was originally done because we were bypassing a herd (lead) in |
5 |
> getting our updates in. Toning it down is not a problem, would just |
6 |
> blueness in the list address your concerns? |
7 |
|
8 |
Current b-w policy is to assign to the first mentioned <maintainer>, |
9 |
then CC all other <maintainer>s and <herd>s[1], so if blueness has no |
10 |
problem with that, then sure. |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
jer |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
[1] Or why would you mention them separately? I think we should still |
17 |
encourage developers to join herds. |