Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Two herds (and four extra?)
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:58:50
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Two herds (and four extra?) by "Tony \\\"Chainsaw\\\" Vroon"
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:36:26 +0100
"Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <chainsaw@g.o> wrote:

> This was originally done because we were bypassing a herd (lead) in > getting our updates in. Toning it down is not a problem, would just > blueness in the list address your concerns?
Current b-w policy is to assign to the first mentioned <maintainer>, then CC all other <maintainer>s and <herd>s[1], so if blueness has no problem with that, then sure. jer [1] Or why would you mention them separately? I think we should still encourage developers to join herds.


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Two herds (and four extra?) "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>