Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42?
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:47:59
Message-Id: 452D2BC9.5060207@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42? by Stuart Herbert
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Stuart Herbert wrote:
5 > Whatever happened to the work to implement GLEP 42? Is there anyone
6 > actively working on this atm?
7
8 It's been on my todo list, but I haven't gotten around to it yet due
9 to other portage work that's kept me extremely busy. I hope to get
10 GLEP 42 implemented soon though.
11
12 On the bright side, portage-2.1.2 [1] has made recent progress on
13 quite a few important and long standing bugs. Here are descriptions
14 of some of the recent changes:
15
16 * Profiles support multiple inheritance.
17 * CONFIG_PROTECT and CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK both support files (not
18 just directories).
19 * Collision protection handles symlinks properly.
20 * Dependencies can be satisfied by installed packages that do not
21 have matching ebuilds in the portage tree or overlay.
22 * Emerge automatically ignores blockers that are made irrelevant by
23 an upgrade.
24 * Emerge builds a complete dependency graph in order to ensure
25 correct merge order and detection of circular dependencies.
26 * The world and system sets allow automatic update of all installed
27 slots.
28 * DEPEND atoms support SLOT dependencies of the form
29 ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}.
30
31 Zac
32
33 [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147007
34 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
36
37 iD8DBQFFLSvG/ejvha5XGaMRArOGAKDNpWrM6t6yOI2UWpzdSMNZI5aDCQCeOGGr
38 2WPgtPacSdHZFWPzib/H4v8=
39 =n+s3
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42? Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42? Brian Jackson <iggy@g.o>