Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:56:49
Message-Id: 1140997900.12387.170.camel@demandred.gnqs.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Alec Warner
1 On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 18:41 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
2 > While you may not think that soliciting comments is useful ( and in some
3 > limited cases I would agree with you ) giving people the opportunity to
4 > comment also means you just covered your ass, in terms of people going
5 > "where the hell did that come from?"
6
7 It also means that the QA team has learned from the lessons of the past
8 (ie devrel). Given Ciaran's personal and vocal history on those
9 lessons, one would naturally assume that he'd jump at this chance to put
10 his own previously stated views on how policy should be derived into
11 practice :)
12
13 Best regards,
14 Stu
15 --
16 Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o
17 Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/
18 http://blog.stuartherbert.com/
19
20 GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu
21 Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C
22 --

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature