| 1 |
My personal opinion: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Unless we have a good reason to do otherwise, don't fuck with upstream. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Damien Levac <damien.levac@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Three points :- |
| 9 |
> > 1) systemd - not all gentoo users subscribe to this 'philosophy' .. >but |
| 10 |
> >no, I don't want get drawn into debates of yes/no of systemd .. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The article start by saying the points are not just for systemd, even |
| 13 |
> though the latter might find the merge more 'needed'... |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> >2) "Today, a separate /usr partition already must be mounted by the |
| 16 |
> >initramfs during early boot, thus making the justification for a |
| 17 |
> >split-off moot." - no, not all gentoo users have an initramfs and |
| 18 |
> >need/want one .. so this is a false assumption. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Agreed, this does not apply to Gentoo. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> >3) I still believe there is merit in distinguishing between binaries |
| 23 |
> >that can/should be run as root, and those that can/should not. Those |
| 24 |
> >that run as root 100% of the time, or use VMs, don't really 'use' linux |
| 25 |
> >in the original sense of the OS .. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> /usr/sbin still exists in a merged usr, so I don't get that point... |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> >*hides in his bike-shed, awaiting the flaming torches....* |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Don't worry: no troll here. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> Damien Levac |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
Archives