| 1 |
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:29:32PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 2 |
> Bryan Østergaard ha scritto: |
| 3 |
> >On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:00:12PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>Bryan Østergaard ha scritto: |
| 5 |
> >>>On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 11:46:32AM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: |
| 6 |
> >>><Snipped silly inflamatory bit> |
| 7 |
> >>>>Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto: |
| 8 |
> >>>>>It is widely perceived that Gentoo has a huge problem with slacker |
| 9 |
> >>>>>archs cluttering up the tree and making maintainers' work harder. |
| 10 |
> >>>>>Clearly, something needs to be done about this. |
| 11 |
> >>>>It's even more perceived that there are a couple of satellite people |
| 12 |
> >>>>who are working very strongly and sometimes (sadly) successfully to |
| 13 |
> >>>>create an un-healty environment for developers and users. Personally I |
| 14 |
> >>>>would mention you Caranm, beu and geoman. |
| 15 |
> >>>Please stop the personal attacks. They serve absolutely no purpose other |
| 16 |
> >>>than poisoning the developer community further. |
| 17 |
> >>> |
| 18 |
> >>>Regards, |
| 19 |
> >>>Bryan Østergaard |
| 20 |
> >>mkay, but sometimes is _really_ difficult, missing flameeyes and keep |
| 21 |
> >>geoman does not make it easyer. |
| 22 |
> >Might be dificult but maybe you could explain how it helps to bash |
| 23 |
> >geoman? A good advice before sending any mail like that is to take at |
| 24 |
> >least 10 minutes break to cool off and then read it again before sending |
| 25 |
> >it. |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> >Regards, |
| 28 |
> >Bryan Østergaard |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> Bashing Stephen Becker for comments like the one you can found at |
| 31 |
> "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163795#c6" may survive also the |
| 32 |
> 10 minutes break, even a night of sleep, and bashing is not enough. |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> FYI the offence has been reiterated in #c12 still from geoman, and |
| 35 |
> enforced by ciaranm in c#16, same bug, same attitude. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
I honestly find it offensive to break archs likewise. But while we can |
| 38 |
all decide to continue to be dicks over this I still completely fail to |
| 39 |
see how it *helps* solve anything. And I guess we want to solve the |
| 40 |
problems instead of just continuing the flames, right? |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
So please ignore previous flames and lets focus on the actual problems. |
| 43 |
Problems like MIPS being behind on some packages and latest stable or |
| 44 |
testing version getting dropped for archs quite often. That's something |
| 45 |
I'd like to see people spending their time on fixing instead of just |
| 46 |
adding fuel to the flames. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Regards, |
| 49 |
Bryan Østergaard |
| 50 |
-- |
| 51 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives