Archives
Archives
| From: | Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use | ||
| Date: | Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:29:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | 7c612fc60710100116n716b4522le6fd370859e01e2f@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | On 10/10/07, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > I think it's OK to start using package.use now considering that |
| 3 | > package.use has been supported since portage-2.1.2 and that's been |
| 4 | > stable since February. There are already a couple of packages using |
| 5 | > it in the tree now. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Is it a good idea for those ebuilds that require new features to have |
| 8 | a >= dependency on a specific version of portage ? Or not ? Can this |
| 9 | help when switching EAPIs ? Or plug the gap while the decision to |
| 10 | switch to EAPI=1 is being taken ? Does /me need more coffee or a good |
| 11 | clue-batting session ? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Denis. |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting rid of lurking no* USE flags - profile-based package.use | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |