| 1 |
On 11/04/2015 09:56 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2015 14:53:20 +0100 hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
>>>> You shouldn't use rsync anymore, it is inherently insecure. The git |
| 4 |
>>>> tree is _properly_ gpg signed so you can verify it's correctness. |
| 5 |
>>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> With the following portage configuration/hooks, any user can run the |
| 7 |
>>>> tree directly from git: |
| 8 |
>>>> https://github.com/hasufell/portage-gentoo-git-config |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> More secure by fetching metadata cache via rsync ? |
| 11 |
>>> Better by running egencache after each sync ? |
| 12 |
>>> I don't think so. |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Yes it is. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> No, it is not. The whole git tree is insecure and no better than |
| 18 |
> rsync or CVS in terms of data security because SHA1 is vulnerable. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Another one who is confusing _any_ collision with _preimage attack_ ;) |
Archives