1 |
On 10/26/2010 06:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Monday, October 25, 2010 18:17:21 Alexis Ballier wrote: |
3 |
>> On Monday 25 October 2010 19:06:45 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
4 |
>>> Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: |
5 |
>>>> Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the |
6 |
>>>> linux |
7 |
>>>> headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in the patched .c file... |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Upstream seem not to care about fixing that; we used to have a patch to |
10 |
>>> "fix" linux-headers, but Mike dropped it with 2.6.35 to stay as close to |
11 |
>>> upstream as possible. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> so now we prefer poor workarounds in dozens of packages to fixing the real |
14 |
>> bug in a single one in order to stay as close as possible to an |
15 |
>> unresponsive upstream? nice |
16 |
> |
17 |
> you're free to argue the merits on lkml like anyone else. this package is |
18 |
> going to be broken in pretty much every distro out there, so pushing limits.h |
19 |
> to whichever package's upstream would be useful too. |
20 |
> -mike |
21 |
|
22 |
for this particular package, it's already fixed in trunk |
23 |
|
24 |
http://mpfc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mpfc/trunk/plugins/input/audiocd/audiocd.c?r1=261&r2=288 |