| 1 |
Mark Loeser wrote: |
| 2 |
> So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from |
| 3 |
> our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should |
| 4 |
> consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to. |
| 5 |
> We already have something very similar to this on the forums, and this |
| 6 |
> would just give the correct tool to put their documentation on. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I already know some people are going to hate this idea and say that the |
| 9 |
> documentation could be wrong, etc, so lets look at how others have |
| 10 |
> handled this situation. It seems that Ubuntu has their own official |
| 11 |
> documentation section and a community section where users can contribute |
| 12 |
> to. We can put a nice big warning saying that the user documentation |
| 13 |
> may have some errors, and that any such errors should not be directed at |
| 14 |
> the maintainers of the package or the GDP. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having a |
| 17 |
> wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a |
| 18 |
> wiki? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I've asked my fellow GDP members to weigh in on this issue on our ML; |
| 22 |
the discussion is already in-progress here: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-doc/msg_dd4f573fc6384108fdf14dfa27030906.xml |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Or, if you like it gmane-style: |
| 27 |
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.documentation/2903 |
Archives