| 1 |
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:06 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 2 |
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > 2008/4/20 Peter Weller <welp@g.o>: |
| 5 |
> >> On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:32 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> > Alon Bar-Lev yazm??: |
| 7 |
> >> > > I suggest gnome-something as it is gnome feature. |
| 8 |
> >> > |
| 9 |
> >> > How about gnome-keyring? :) |
| 10 |
> >> > |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> Why? All the ebuilds currently using the 'keyring' use flag are using it |
| 13 |
> >> for gnome-keyring. As long as there is a proper description of the USE |
| 14 |
> >> flag, there should be no confusion caused. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Because it may be confusing. |
| 17 |
> True. |
| 18 |
"Proper description of the USE flag" |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> > As long as it is local flag for gnome packages, the gnome is implicit. |
| 21 |
> > If you want it to be global, gnome should be explicit. |
| 22 |
> Only in case there are other packages which use a 'keyring' use flag which |
| 23 |
> means something else than support for gnome-keyring. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I'd say we should convert it to a global use flag now with a good |
| 26 |
> description and change it to gnome-keyring later in case we really have a |
| 27 |
> package which needs 'keyring' for something else. |
| 28 |
I agree with what dev-zero just wrote there. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives