| 1 |
Hello All, |
| 2 |
I'm wanting to create a new category in portage, dev-scheme. There are several |
| 3 |
scheme related ebuilds currently residing in various places (dev-util, |
| 4 |
dev-lisp, etc) and consolidating them all into the same place would I think be |
| 5 |
more sane for developers and users. In the past month there have been 3 new |
| 6 |
developers brought in that have expressed interest in maintaining scheme |
| 7 |
ebuilds, I think the new category would help with the maintenance. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The builds that I feel should be moved to dev-scheme are: dev-lisp/plt, |
| 10 |
dev-lisp/kawa, dev-lisp/mzscheme, dev-lisp/bigloo, dev-lisp/gauche, |
| 11 |
dev-lisp/drscheme, dev-lisp/chicken, dev-lisp/mit-scheme and dev-util/guile. |
| 12 |
There may be others that I have missed, (Matt, anything?). Guile has the most |
| 13 |
dependencies, with around 34 of them. There may be some debate as to whether |
| 14 |
or not guile should be moved, but as guile is a Scheme interpreter I think |
| 15 |
it's appropriate. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If people have objections, please let me know. The clock is ticking :-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-Blake |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Blake Matheny |
| 23 |
jake@g.o Computer Science is merely the post-Turing |
| 24 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~jake/ decline in formal systems theory. |
| 25 |
http://mkfifo.net/gpg.key |
Archives