| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Does this mean that we can get rid of the libstd++ dependency of gcc, |
| 5 |
and move it to the binary packages that depends on gcc 3.3 . |
| 6 |
I know this has been discussed before, but once it's stable I see no |
| 7 |
reason to keep the dependency in the gcc ebuild, when it could be in the |
| 8 |
binary packages. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Bjarke |
| 11 |
Mark Loeser skrev: |
| 12 |
> This is basically a heads-up email to everyone to say that we are probably |
| 13 |
> going to be moving gcc-3.4.4-r1 to stable on x86 very soon. If any of the |
| 14 |
> archs that have already done the move from having 3.3 stable to 3.4 could |
| 15 |
> give us a heads up on what to expect, that would be great. Only thing I see |
| 16 |
> as lacking is we might want to get a doc together on how to properly upgrade |
| 17 |
> your toolchain so we don't get an influx of bugs from users that have a |
| 18 |
> system half compiled with 3.3 and the other half with 3.4 so they get linking |
| 19 |
> errors. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Thanks, |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Mark |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) |
| 27 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iD8DBQFDi0h3O+Ewtpi9rLERAibAAKCedui46gqRaBmwMpkufdQdw88ikQCfcgQu |
| 30 |
UybgL9DJQXbD93CxuiHztEQ= |
| 31 |
=+tUe |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives