Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Jones <gentoo@×××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 04 Nov 2019 20:05:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | CABfmKSLT3mJKvKiwzeHPdmfi8pdUzn3fQE8N3WZOKOmmrr6+BA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:26 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > That way is not building static libraries at all. If we go that way as |
| 4 | > a distro the support for forcing static libraries into /usr/lib* is not |
| 5 | > needed because we would just not allow static libraries. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | As an end user, I would be unhappy if static libraries were no longer |
| 9 | supported at all. I use them regularly for my development work. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |