1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 17 May 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Upstreams don't standardise either way on - vs _, so there's no |
4 |
> reason Gentoo should. |
5 |
|
6 |
Upstreams use all sorts of strange versioning schemes. Here is a small |
7 |
collection: |
8 |
|
9 |
1_14 -> 1.14 (app-emacs/limit) |
10 |
1.0pre4 -> 1.0_pre4 (app-emacs/cedet) |
11 |
1.9.1-preview1 -> 1.9.1_pre1 (app-emacs/ruby-mode) |
12 |
2.0b6 -> 2.0_beta6 (app-emacs/chess) |
13 |
12B5 -> 12.2.5 (dev-lang/erlang) |
14 |
0.28 -> 28.0 (dev-lang/c-intercal, minor.major) |
15 |
-0.74 -> ?? (SmallEiffel, negative version number) |
16 |
1.-94.-2 -> ?? (CLC-Intercal, negative components) |
17 |
|
18 |
We have to draw the borderline somewhere, and I think our current |
19 |
rules are a reasonable compromise. |
20 |
|
21 |
Ulrich |