Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:54:07
Message-Id: 18960.38284.120184.856068@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated by Ciaran McCreesh
1 >>>>> On Sun, 17 May 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2
3 > Upstreams don't standardise either way on - vs _, so there's no
4 > reason Gentoo should.
5
6 Upstreams use all sorts of strange versioning schemes. Here is a small
7 collection:
8
9 1_14 -> 1.14 (app-emacs/limit)
10 1.0pre4 -> 1.0_pre4 (app-emacs/cedet)
11 1.9.1-preview1 -> 1.9.1_pre1 (app-emacs/ruby-mode)
12 2.0b6 -> 2.0_beta6 (app-emacs/chess)
13 12B5 -> 12.2.5 (dev-lang/erlang)
14 0.28 -> 28.0 (dev-lang/c-intercal, minor.major)
15 -0.74 -> ?? (SmallEiffel, negative version number)
16 1.-94.-2 -> ?? (CLC-Intercal, negative components)
17
18 We have to draw the borderline somewhere, and I think our current
19 rules are a reasonable compromise.
20
21 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>