| 1 |
> Now that's something that sound reasonable. Why limit the period and |
| 2 |
> don't provide it forever? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
To comment slightly here: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Forever and Unlimited are always just dirty lies. Don't make promises |
| 7 |
you can't keep. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
To be fair even some of Robin's comments are odd, mentioning |
| 10 |
'permanent urls'. Sure because in the future /foo/bar/baz/ will |
| 11 |
always work *wink wink*. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
The point here is that Robin (and Jokey, others?) have put forth a |
| 14 |
commendable effort to serve (by Robin's numbers) 93% of all customers |
| 15 |
effectively over a complete rewrite of an application and thats not |
| 16 |
bad service (however much you wish it was 100%). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
To comment from a sysadmin's perspective; just because it's |
| 19 |
technically possible to do X, doesn't make X a good choice, |
| 20 |
particularly coming from the guy who has to run the application rather |
| 21 |
than just write the code. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-Alec |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives