1 |
El lun, 17-09-2012 a las 07:56 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió: |
2 |
> Ben de Groot wrote: |
3 |
> > On 16 September 2012 23:40, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
4 |
> > > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
5 |
> > >> # Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> (16 Sep 2012) |
6 |
> > >> # Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again |
7 |
> > >> # now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month. |
8 |
> > >> net-im/jabberd |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > What about the 1.4 version? It depends on openssl, so maybe it |
11 |
> > > doesn't have the gnutls issue. |
12 |
> > > |
13 |
> > > I kinda like jabberd. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > So step up and take on maintainership of that package. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I would have, had I been a developer. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I still haven't finished the recruitment process. It requires so much |
20 |
> concentrated effort that it is a significant project which I can not |
21 |
> fit into my schedule without cutting into too many other things. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> It's been that way for a few years now. Maybe something will change |
24 |
> in Prague. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> //Peter |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
I really doubt even oldest 1.4 version will have less unresolved bugs |
32 |
than current (already unmaintained and buggy) 1.6.x versions |