| 1 |
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> I agree. I think that any "master" version of whatever repo we use should |
| 3 |
> be hosted on gentoo owned infrastructure. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Github might be allowed to take pull requests but I think it should be a |
| 6 |
> slave to whatever's hosted on gentoo. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> That way if anything gets screwed up on github gentoo could always hit the |
| 9 |
> big fat reset button on gitub |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
That is essentially all that is being proposed. The pull request |
| 12 |
system already exists on github. Really all the proposal is about is |
| 13 |
better integrating it with bugzilla, which if anything makes the |
| 14 |
content more accessible via FOSS tools. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Counter-intuitively, the repo itself is actually the part that |
| 17 |
concerns me the least. With git the local clone you keep on your |
| 18 |
desktop is just as suitable as any other copy of the repo should we |
| 19 |
ever have to hit the reset button. The part that isn't distributed is |
| 20 |
all the comments, discussion, issues, review, etc which generally goes |
| 21 |
into bugzilla. If that were also a distributed database I'd have few |
| 22 |
concerns about where that was hosted, since we're essentially talking |
| 23 |
about the hosting only. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Rich |
Archives