| 1 |
On 12/13/19 4:17 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: |
| 2 |
> The mail-filter/milter-regex ebuild already uses user/group 'milter', |
| 3 |
> and for the currently open bump to version 2.7 I'd like to claim GID/UID |
| 4 |
> 438. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I recently cited the "milter" user on this list as a bad example from |
| 7 |
the user.eclass days... it was used by at least three unrelated |
| 8 |
packages: milter-regex, opendmarc, and opendkim. I fixed opendkim, of |
| 9 |
course, but it looks like opendmarc still uses "milter" as its user, too. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Now would be a good time to switch them to unique accounts, since |
| 12 |
neither package should be able to access the other's files. The obvious |
| 13 |
choice for opendmarc is "opendmarc", and that's even what upstream |
| 14 |
defaults to -- we sed it to "milter" in Gentoo. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I guess we could keep "milter" for only regex-milter, but that has the |
| 17 |
disadvantage that it messes with the opendmarc package in the meantime. |
| 18 |
Upstream uses "_milter-regex", and according to the PMS that's... |
| 19 |
actually... a legal package name? How do people feel about that? It's |
| 20 |
insane, for sure; but I'm too tired to tell if it's good insane or bad |
| 21 |
insane. |
Archives