| 1 |
This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into systemd! |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
- still install udevd into /sbin where a daemon belongs to. |
| 6 |
- disable the crappy new network naming scheme by default |
| 7 |
- install the new naming scheme config files into /lib/udev/network/ (version >=209) |
| 8 |
- try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd crap. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I have no plans to stop fixing the annoyances the gentoo udev ebuilds have since udev was integrated into systemd in the ebuilds from my overlay. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
<div>-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------</div><div>Von: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> </div><div>Datum:24.02.2014 16:55 (GMT+01:00) </div><div>An: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> </div><div>Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for >=sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade </div><div> |
| 13 |
</div>On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. <whissi@××××××.de> wrote: |
| 14 |
> Hi, |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I don't have |
| 17 |
> "/lib/systemd/" (INSTALL_MASK). |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> The current news item draft raises question like "When the 'actual |
| 20 |
> configuration' is in /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link... what will |
| 21 |
> happen to people without systemd (and a INSTALL_MASK set)?" |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Would be nice if the news item and Wiki could handle upgrade path for |
| 24 |
> systemd *and* non-systemd users... |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
You need to remove /lib/systemd/ from INSTALL_MASK. If you don't want |
| 28 |
unit files, mask /lib/systemd/system/ instead. |
Archives