1 |
Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> posted fiop46$9o$1@×××××××××.org, |
2 |
excerpted below, on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:42:03 +0000: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Duncan wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
>> It's kinda hard to discuss such a proposal without knowing where it is |
7 |
>> going to be applied |
8 |
|
9 |
> I took it to mean anything which changes something already documented on |
10 |
> a gentoo doc website (including the devmanual but not individual dev |
11 |
> space) or in a man page. [...] Additions would count too; I'd imagine |
12 |
> someone adding a new feature would want others to know about it. |
13 |
|
14 |
> I saw [this] as an attempt to make the development team aware of |
15 |
> documentation responsibility, and asking them to bear that in mind when |
16 |
> they change or add stuff [...] It doesn't have to mean sanctions at any |
17 |
> point, but rather that someone would be put in touch with docs if they |
18 |
> needed help to document stuff. I'd think new people would welcome that. |
19 |
|
20 |
OK. That makes sense, and the last part agrees with the reply I got from |
21 |
the private inquiry I mentioned. Quoting a single though from Donnie's |
22 |
reply: |
23 |
|
24 |
> This isn't about punishing people. But it could be about |
25 |
> reverting their commit until it comes back with documentation. |
26 |
|
27 |
IMO people are (unfortunately correctly, given history) afraid of |
28 |
something being used to clobber them over the head. If the above thought |
29 |
were included virtually verbatim in whatever is ultimately hard-proposed, |
30 |
I believe it'd go a LONG way to avoiding that, since the "clobber limits" |
31 |
are now clearly defined and (IMO) reasonable. |
32 |
|
33 |
I guess I've been concerned that neither the reach of nor the weight of |
34 |
the "clobber stick" seemed limited in any way, and I think we've seen |
35 |
that an unlimited "clobber stick" isn't a good thing. I was trying to |
36 |
limit the reach; Donnie didn't want that, but now I see his point that |
37 |
limiting the weight is equally abuse preventative, while less crippling |
38 |
to the effectiveness of the tool. |
39 |
|
40 |
So provided a substantively similar "clobber limit" appears in the final |
41 |
proposal, I'm now supportive. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
45 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
46 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |