Archives
Archives
| From: | Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman | ||
| Date: | Sat, 12 Mar 2022 10:37:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | f8f48c64a27b20983e80172da2af821c62b5b2d9.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman by Joshua Kinard |
||
| 1 | Ühel kenal päeval, R, 11.03.2022 kell 21:53, kirjutas Joshua Kinard: |
| 2 | > the extra checks that pkgcheck runs haven't really applied to me. |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Looks to be mostly true, as you maintain only a few packages, but you |
| 5 | might find these links useful to filter the CI output per maintainer |
| 6 | regardless: |
| 7 | |
| 8 | https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=kumba |
| 9 | https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=kumba;include-projects |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Or some of these: |
| 12 | |
| 13 | https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainer/kumba@g.o/stabilization |
| 14 | https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainer/kumba@g.o/outdated |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Mart |