1 |
On 2007/03/25, Benno Schulenberg <benno.schulenberg@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Precisely. "NOTABUG" sounds less harsh than "INVALID" (for some |
4 |
> just a little, for others a lot), it is less likely to irk people, |
5 |
> and it is also used elsewhere, so why not use it instead? |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
Not that i care that much, but imho INVALID is more accurate in some |
9 |
cases. |
10 |
|
11 |
For instance, if one reports about app/foo being broken but happens to |
12 |
have ricer CFLAGS in his "emerge info", his report will be closed as |
13 |
INVALID... which is exactly what it is: an invalid report, because not |
14 |
made in sane conditions. This resolution usualy comes with a note |
15 |
which tell to reopen if the bug still happen after app/foo has been |
16 |
recompiled with sane CFLAGS. The possibity that there is a real bug in |
17 |
app/foo is left open. At the contrary, NOTABUG sounds to me like a |
18 |
definitive answer. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
TGL. |
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |