| 1 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
>> |
| 3 |
>> Assuming you mean piotr, who is not pioto... The difference is, piotr's |
| 4 |
>> proposal is possible and doable within the timeframe, whereas lu_zero's |
| 5 |
>> sounds nice if you don't know anything about any of the package |
| 6 |
>> managers in question and can't be delivered within three months. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I'd like to know your opinion about which are the pitfalls and the |
| 9 |
> issues since you are surely more informed than me on paludis and, to a |
| 10 |
> large degree, on portage internals. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I assumed that for a foundation and a non exaustive converage the summer |
| 13 |
> would be more than enough. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm more interested in a solid base than a complete and exaustive wrapper |
| 16 |
> =) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> lu |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> PS: if the other project leaders would like to chip in I wouldn't be |
| 21 |
> offended ^^ |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'd imagine portage lacks many of the things that would be wrapped |
| 24 |
(multiple repos being probably the big killer). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives