| 1 |
On 05/30/2013 10:52 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:30:00AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Because it isn't just editing a file or rebuilding the kernel but also |
| 4 |
>> have a short trip in single mode to switch back and forth inittab. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> inittab is only used by sysvinit and busybox init right? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
By anything that claims to be init-compatible. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> If so, it is unfortunate that busybox init uses inittab and its inittab |
| 11 |
> is not compatible with sysvinit. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Surely is. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I'm tending to agree with mgorny that a better fix for this might be to |
| 16 |
> have busybox use an alternate filename for its inittab, i.e. |
| 17 |
> first look for /etc/bb-inittab and use it, then if it can't find that, |
| 18 |
> use /etc/inittab as a fallback. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
sending patches should be easy. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> What do you think? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I stated the worst cases, I guess is time to draft stuff and see how it |
| 25 |
does behave. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
lu |
Archives