1 |
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 5:20 PM Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 14:45:11 -0500 |
4 |
> Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > I guess my question to you is whether you think it's okay to mask -304 |
7 |
> > for removal or whether there are enough users that we should keep it |
8 |
> > under package.mask? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> "The Linux 304.* legacy driver series is the last to support the NV4x |
11 |
> and G7x GPUs and motherboard chipsets based on them. Support for new |
12 |
> Linux kernels and X servers, as well as fixes for critical bugs, will |
13 |
> be included in 304.* legacy releases through the end of 2017." [1] |
14 |
> |
15 |
> That should be fine, then: 304 no longer receives security support so it |
16 |
> can go away along with xorg-server-1.19. |
17 |
|
18 |
Thanks Jer! |