| 1 |
On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:00:41 -0400 |
| 2 |
Olivier Crête <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 01:18 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Maybe you should use /var/tmp for that? Or ~/tmp/ ? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > OTOH, we could use an rc.conf configuration variable to control |
| 8 |
> > whether /tmp is mounted as tmpfs. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Having /tmp and /var/tmp as tmpfs sounds like a terrible idea.. I |
| 11 |
> don't think we should facilitate it in any way. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I always thought we're having two separate temporary directories |
| 14 |
because /tmp is for small data (i.e. suitable for tmpfs) while /var/tmp |
| 15 |
is for larger one. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Michał Górny |
Archives