| 1 |
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:07:38 +0300 |
| 2 |
Alex Alexander <wired@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sep 22, 2012 10:58 AM, "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Hello, |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > The current dependency syntax: |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > [VERSION-OP] PACKAGE-NAME ["-" PACKAGE-VERSION] |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > suffers a few problems: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> The syntax you are describing is used all over portage, not just |
| 15 |
> dependencies. Some examples are the /etc/portage/package.* files, |
| 16 |
> has_version or exact version matching when emerging. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Yes, having it in all cases would be good. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
Archives