1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
IMO, the USE flag should be needed to enable customizations, not to disable |
5 |
them. 'vanilla' should be the default with '-*' |
6 |
|
7 |
On Thursday 28 August 2003 01:37 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
8 |
> On Thursday 28 August 2003 07:28, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
9 |
> > Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> said: |
10 |
> > > On Thursday 28 August 2003 12:51, dams@×××.fr wrote: |
11 |
> > >> The problem is that the conclusion will tend to tune/modify the DE, |
12 |
> > >> and it seems that people here don't want that, they want vanilla DE. |
13 |
> > >> For ex., menu system is the first improvment I think of, but it has a |
14 |
> > >> big impact on the look&feel of the DE. If we don't want DE tuned, then |
15 |
> > >> we cannot use debian like menu system. |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > That is true, there might be some custom parts in the DE's. I those |
18 |
> > > cases I think we should have some "vanilla" useflag that turns of |
19 |
> > > customizations/hacks that are gentoo-specific and are safe to turn of |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > That's feasable, but may add some maintainance overloading |
22 |
> |
23 |
> not really ... any code you add just put 'if [ ! `use vanilla` ] ; then' |
24 |
> around ... |
25 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8732 |
26 |
> -mike |
27 |
|
28 |
- -- |
29 |
Luke-Jr |
30 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
31 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
33 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
34 |
|
35 |
iD8DBQE/TuMFZl/BHdU+lYMRAiyRAJ0QYtpj1zFrdren4NP4diXUWiFuZwCggrdL |
36 |
g2mXGpb8DTNZ5t5LHmcNWSQ= |
37 |
=u29b |
38 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |