Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kito <kito@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EBUILD_FORMAT support
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 04:40:26
Message-Id: 88F6D0D3-99A2-4C37-A233-D34EFB1EE5F3@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] EBUILD_FORMAT support by "Nathan L. Adams"
1 On Jul 6, 2005, at 8:01 PM, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
2
3 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
4 > Hash: SHA1
5 >
6 > Sven Wegener wrote:
7 >
8 >> On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 08:41:43PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
9 >>
10 >>
11 >>> On Wednesday 06 July 2005 08:20 pm, Sven Wegener wrote:
12 >>>
13 >>>
14 >>>> We would like to introduce a new ebuild variable named
15 >>>> EBUILD_FORMAT,
16 >>>>
17 >>>
18 >>> seems like the name is much longer than it needs to be ... what's
19 >>> wrong with
20 >>> say 'EVER' ?
21 >>>
22 >>
23 >>
24 >> It's fine too. EBUILD_FORMAT was just the name that fell in
25 >> #gentoo-portage once we discussed about it.
26 >>
27 >> Sven
28 >>
29 >>
30 >
31 > EVER looks like the english word 'ever'; what does it stand for?
32 > EBUILD
33 > VERSION? If so, how about EVERSION? Since when was variable name
34 > length
35 > a problem? Go with whatever best describes the variable and is easy to
36 > figure out.
37
38 Why not follow that logic through and use something like EBUILD_API ?
39 the term VERSION implies release version which of course may not be
40 tied to API changes...
41
42 Kito
43
44 >
45 > Nathan
46 >
47 >
48 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
49 > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
50 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
51 >
52 > iD8DBQFCzH772QTTR4CNEQARAlimAJ0Yh80KpXqc0yZv6Gli+KqpWaKBxQCfU6pR
53 > 2WqrKs4MfY+RCgpoFxZKD8Q=
54 > =5nzV
55 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
56 > --
57 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
58 >
59 >
60
61 --
62 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] EBUILD_FORMAT support Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>