Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael 'veremitz' Everitt <gentoo@×××××××.xyz>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy?
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:25:09
Message-Id: b0f03620-248d-2020-8c59-6ac3548d7f36@veremit.xyz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? by Michael Orlitzky
1 On 04/11/19 23:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2 > On 11/4/19 2:40 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
3 >>
4 >> This is a whole other thread I've been talking about for years, but if
5 >> we want to be concerned about dumping "garbage" on people's limited root
6 >> file systems, there are other things we need to re-consider, like our
7 >> notion that we have to install small files everywhere even though they
8 >> aren't always used.
9 >>
10 >> So, if you want to talk about that, please start a whole new thread.
11 >>
12 >
13 > 1. The idea that we should fix all existing problems before we can
14 >    prevent people from creating new ones is ridiculous.
15 >
16 > 2. Those other files don't get installed to the root filesystem on the
17 >    systems that we're talking about.
18 >
19 > 3. Those other files generally aren't completely useless.
20 >
21 > 4. "small files" aren't big.
22 >
23 >
24 Straw man anyone? I know Guy Fawkes night is coming up here in the UK ... ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Do (old-ish) Portage QA checks comprise policy? Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o>