| 1 |
Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017, 14:32:13 CEST schrieb Ulrich Mueller: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> On Tue, 2 May 2017, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Also very common is that he changes fully qualified package names |
| 4 |
> > (which is the correct syntax per [1]) into fully qualified package |
| 5 |
> > atoms (which is the legacy syntax). Bug 616260 is one such example. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Can't the stable-bot enforce the correct syntax? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
A little bird already mentioned to me that the stable bot ignores bugs filed by |
| 12 |
one particular developer, who insists to repeatedly fill in invalid data and |
| 13 |
can't be taught otherwise. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
(And that's just about the maximum level of "enforcement" possible here. |
| 16 |
Should be effective on the long run though.) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 21 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives