| 1 |
On Saturday 12 May 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jan Kundrát wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Matti Bickel wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> It's main additions are a "timely response clause", which |
| 5 |
> >> requires us to get the same keywords for a newly released version as the |
| 6 |
> >> previous had within 28 days. Another point is the "no patches" clause, |
| 7 |
> >> which prohibits distributions from carrying a "significantly modified" |
| 8 |
> >> ion-3 release under the ion name. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > So just rename the package to something that "clearly illustrates that |
| 11 |
> > this isn't teh upstream Ion anymore!!!111one" and be done with that. If |
| 12 |
> > users complain, ask them to talk to Tuomo Valkonen. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Perhaps "atom," an uncharged single ion. =) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
the words "uncharged ion" dont belong together as an ion by definition carries |
| 17 |
a charge :p |
| 18 |
-mike |
Archives