| 1 |
On 3/2/2021 2:36 PM, Alessandro Barbieri wrote: |
| 2 |
> Il Mar 2 Mar 2021, 20:03 Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o |
| 3 |
> <mailto:mattst88@g.o>> ha scritto: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:11 AM Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o |
| 6 |
> <mailto:mjo@g.o>> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > why don't we just enforce putting |
| 8 |
> each |
| 9 |
> > keyword on a separate line instead, so that we don't have this |
| 10 |
> problem |
| 11 |
> > in the first place? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Why don't we change 30 thousand ebuilds rather than use this script? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> IMO before this the keyword mechanism should be reworked to be three-state: |
| 17 |
> 1 Arch known working |
| 18 |
> 2 Arch known not working |
| 19 |
> 3 Arch untested/status unknown |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> And let the user choose to use packages from 3 or not |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
This is how it already is. 1 and 3 are common but 2 is uncommon except |
| 24 |
for binary only packages. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Brian |
Archives