1 |
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 21:30, Anthony Gorecki wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 19 October 2004 10:26 am, Dan Armak wrote: |
3 |
> > I've spent the last few years pointing out to various people why this |
4 |
> > couldn't be done (well). Eventually I got really tired, so we did it. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> This announcement is good to hear, though my one concern is regarding |
7 |
> updates to KDE. Will only two developers be able to keep all of these |
8 |
> packages up-to-date? |
9 |
|
10 |
By now, we are in 4 developers (I'm the newest one). |
11 |
Yep the update will be more difficult, but I think that it won't take that |
12 |
more time. For example with a little script I've updated every ebuild from |
13 |
3.3.0 to 3.3.1 in 10 minutes. And I just tested all of them in one day of |
14 |
compilation, fixing some bugs. |
15 |
Probably using "repoman commit" this will take a little more time, and I'm |
16 |
thinking if this can be automated for example passing to it in the command |
17 |
line also the CVS changelog. (I'm just supposing, I don't know nothing of how |
18 |
repoman internally works). So I think that a good and easy solution can be |
19 |
found. |
20 |
Also remember that before a major version usually we're always testing kde CVS |
21 |
and also the various alpha, beta and rc1, these last versions are already in |
22 |
feature freeze and so the dependencies shouldn't change and the time to test |
23 |
the ebuilds is quite long (at least one month) |
24 |
|
25 |
Bye! |