Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: extension of etc-update
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:35:08
Message-Id: pan.2004.08.11.10.35.00.624773@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: extension of etc-update by Mike Williams
1 Mike Williams posted <200408101156.17481.mike@××××××××.uk>, excerpted
2 below, on Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:56:16 +0100:
3
4 > On Tuesday 10 August 2004 11:43, Joerg Hoh wrote:
5 >
6 >> Another extension would be versioning of configuration files via cvs/rcs,
7 >> subversion or arch. But I had to do some more work on that ...
8 >
9 > dispatch-conf does basic backing up before overwriting.
10
11 Right.. Unfortunately, when I try to use it, I get file move errors, as if
12 it's attempting to hard-link across partitions. I like the idea.. if it
13 worked! (I haven't bug-checked this, as I expected it was designed that
14 way and therefore known behavior. I just went back to etc-update, which
15 /still/ doesn't page right with the default config due to a parse error
16 because it wants quotes. See bug.. 56785.. still marked new nearly a
17 month later, and even tho etc-update is documented core portage
18 functionality, even with a proposed patch in the form of an improved
19 sed command posted to the bug.)
20
21 --
22 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
23 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
24 temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
25 Benjamin Franklin
26
27
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list