Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:02:42
Message-Id: 20150421150224.GA10882@linux1
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug? by grozin@gentoo.org
1 On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:57:16AM +0600, grozin@g.o wrote:
2 > Hello *,
3 >
4 > There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was
5 > "fixed" by Mark Wright <gienah@g.o> on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However,
6 > after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed
7 > ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. So, is a user has, e.g.,
8 > -O2 in his/her ${CFLAGS}, it was silently replaced by -O3. For some time,
9 > nobody noticed this: gcc-4.8 happily compiled the C stuff in sbcl with
10 > -O3.
11
12 The best fix here would be to ask upstream to stop putting -O3 in their
13 default CFLAGS.
14
15 Thanks,
16
17 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature