| 1 |
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:26 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> That still does not explain the reasons why this work was initiated. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> If there is any way to fix the current eclass, that should be preferred. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I tend to agree. Michał, let me first say I value the time you have |
| 7 |
invested to make the eclasses better. However, at this point I have a |
| 8 |
strong feeling that we have more people willing to write code to fix |
| 9 |
things than we have people building consensus on what |
| 10 |
features/policies/mechanisms we need to make it easy to write |
| 11 |
high-quality ebuilds for Python/distutils. I would prefer discussions |
| 12 |
on problems that the current ebuilds have and discussions on how to |
| 13 |
solve them, not at the code level, but that the mechanism level. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Cheers, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Dirkjan |
Archives