| 1 |
Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I don't know about general consensus. In my opinion, it's plain spam to |
| 4 |
>> existing users. (And that would IMO be the xth news item in a row to be |
| 5 |
>> spam.) |
| 6 |
> Can't say I agree here. Some news items have been more useful than |
| 7 |
> others, but I doubt the typical Gentoo user (who does not subscribe to |
| 8 |
> -dev) would think that many of the past messages have been spam. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> << SNIP >> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Rich |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I agree with this. I see messages that may not apply to me but I always |
| 17 |
keep in mind that it may apply to a large number of other users. I |
| 18 |
would MUCH rather see a message sent out that doesn't apply to me than |
| 19 |
to not see one that should have been sent out but wasn't. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Just a users opinion and expectations. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dale |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:-) :-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives