| 1 |
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 04:26 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sunday 22 May 2005 11:09, Stuart Longland wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Why not just use `chmod -R 0:0 ${D}`? That should have the desired |
| 4 |
> > effect? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Yes that will have so that should be good for all systems. For me that is |
| 7 |
> ok... nobody disagrees? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
only other idea i'd consider is having portage scan $D before each merge |
| 10 |
looking for files owned by group portage ? or perhaps making an eutils func |
| 11 |
for people to invoke ... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
but this is probably just as much cruft as the get_root_group() idea ... i |
| 14 |
imagine if someone comes up with a reason down the road why using gid 0 is a |
| 15 |
bad idea, they'll let us know and we can review this again |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Diego: feel free to commit the wheel -> 0 group change |
| 18 |
-mike |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives