| 1 |
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 19:25, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Just a friendly reminder (especially for new developers) to only mark |
| 5 |
> stable for architectures you can actually test for. If you can test for a |
| 6 |
> given arch but are not part of the given arch team, please make 100% sure |
| 7 |
> the arch team knows you can test on that architecture. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I hate to breathe new life into this debate, but I have a request for the arch |
| 10 |
teams. This is in direct response to an issue that happened this week. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Please do not mark webapp-config, or any web-based app, as stable unless it |
| 13 |
has been marked stable on the package maintainer's architecture. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If you *need* to mark a package as stable when it's not marked as stable on |
| 16 |
the maintainer's arch, and it's *not* for a GLSA, talk to the named |
| 17 |
maintainer first. If there isn't a named maintainer, talk to me or mholzer. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
And please - make sure you add a ChangeLog entry. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Stu |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
| 25 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 26 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
| 29 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
| 30 |
-- |
Archives