| 1 |
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:56:35 +0000 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:20:54 +0100 Niels Vandekeybus |
| 5 |
> <niels.vandekeybus@×××××××××××××××××××.be> wrote: |
| 6 |
> | I was just wandering why fluxbox-9.7.0 is marked stable for x86, when |
| 7 |
> | the official stable version (according to http://www.fluxbox.org/) is |
| 8 |
> | still 0.1.14? not that I'm experiencing any problems with it, it just |
| 9 |
> | didn't seem right. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> In addition to what Markus said, 0.1.x isn't supported upstream any |
| 12 |
> more. If we report bugs in 0.1.x the response is "use 0.9.x instead |
| 13 |
> please". |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Ciaran McCreesh |
| 17 |
> Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 18 |
> Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
That clears some things up, thx for your replies :-) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. |
| 26 |
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html |
Archives