Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation (was: Project Sunrise resumed)
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 04:30:47
Message-Id: 20060731052751.0dc06ec2@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation (was: Project Sunrise resumed) by Alex Tarkovsky
1 On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky"
2 <alextarkovsky@×××××.com> wrote:
3 | This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
4 | developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
5
6 Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
7
8 Even that aside, if a couple of hundred developers can't handle doing
9 QA for all those maintainer-wanted ebuilds, what makes you think four
10 people can?
11
12 --
13 Ciaran McCreesh
14 Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk
15
16
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation (was: Project Sunrise resumed) Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation Joshua Jackson <tsunam@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation (was: Project Sunrise resumed) Alex Tarkovsky <alextarkovsky@×××××.com>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Resignation Ryan Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com>