| 1 |
On Sat, 14 May 2016 20:57:48 -0400 |
| 2 |
Göktürk Yüksek <gokturk@××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> @@ -244,12 +221,7 @@ optional: |
| 5 |
> without this attribute must also exist. That tag without the restrict |
| 6 |
> attribute will serve as the default. The format of the restrict attribute |
| 7 |
> is that of the DEPEND flag, except that "<" and |
| 8 |
> - ">" need to be specified by &lt; and &gt;.<br /> |
| 9 |
> - <br /> |
| 10 |
> - For example, in the <c>sys-libs/db</c> package, |
| 11 |
> - <c>restrict="&gt;=sys-libs/db-3.2.9-r5"</c> on the |
| 12 |
> - <brite>maintainer</brite> tag shows that I'm currently maintaining all |
| 13 |
> - versions greater then 3.2.9-r5. |
| 14 |
> + ">" need to be specified by "&lt;" and "&gt;". |
| 15 |
> </ti> |
| 16 |
> </tr> |
| 17 |
> <tr> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm sorry for coming late to the party but could you mention that it |
| 20 |
must be an EAPI 0 package dependency? There were more than a few |
| 21 |
packages where people put slot- or USE-dependencies there. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Michał Górny |
| 26 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives