Archives
Archives
| From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs | ||
| Date: | Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:57:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1304157425.6896.7.camel@localhost.localdomain | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Devmanual text on ChangeLogs by "Petteri Räty" |
||
| 1 | El sáb, 30-04-2011 a las 11:46 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: |
| 2 | > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > There doesn't seem to be a common opinion on what the policy for |
| 5 | > ChangeLog entries is. See: |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f829da2375f1ceab766a800913cc4998.xml |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > I propose a simple new text: "Every commit should have an entry in |
| 10 | > ChangeLog." If we eventually autogenerate them from git logs this would |
| 11 | > happen any way (unless some kind of filtering system is in the middle) |
| 12 | > so we could already start now. I think it's better to have more than |
| 13 | > less information available to users. |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > Regards, |
| 16 | > Petteri |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | |
| 19 | I don't have a strong opinion about what option is the one I think the |
| 20 | best but, either way, could |
| 21 | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=5#doc_chap8 be updated also with the final decision? That is the doc I periodically review to remember exact steps when cleaning old packages. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | Thanks a lot |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |