1 |
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 02:58:03PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote |
2 |
> On Sat, 21 May 2016 11:19:07 -0400 |
3 |
> waltdnes@××××××××.org wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > 5. An reversed variant of INSTALL_MASK in make.conf, e.g. |
6 |
> > LOCALE_ALLOW="foo bar fubar" |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > which would block installing files in /usr/share/locale/* and |
9 |
> > /usr/share/man/* EXCEPT for... |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > /usr/share/locale/foo |
12 |
> > /usr/share/locale/bar |
13 |
> > /usr/share/locale/fubar |
14 |
> > /usr/share/man/foo |
15 |
> > /usr/share/man/bar |
16 |
> > /usr/share/man/fubar |
17 |
> |
18 |
> This can be accomplished using inclusion/exclusion logic included in |
19 |
> the patches I've recently sent for Portage. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> INSTALL_MASK="/usr/share/locale -/usr/share/locale/foo" |
22 |
|
23 |
Thanks. localepurge cleans up after the fact. Your patches would |
24 |
prevent the problem in the first place, which is a better approach. It |
25 |
also handles systemd files and can be used when some new stuff comes up |
26 |
in future that we haven't thought of yet. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> |
30 |
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications |